Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Texas

CMC Rebar Melissa

Melissa, TX · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Rebar Melissa runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade A.

CMC Rebar Melissa: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Rebar Melissa safety composite

CMC Rebar Melissa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CMC Rebar Melissa held a steady TCR band

CMC Rebar Melissa's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Melissa, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/182
  • PHOTO Heavy Fabrication
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heavy Fabrication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CMC Rebar Melissa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Rebar Melissa averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Rebar Melissa TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Rebar Melissa falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 182 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Texas.

CMC Rebar Melissa (34 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Rebar Melissa
CMC Rebar Melissa (34 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

CMC Rebar Melissa has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · TX · Melissa

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 12 employers in Melissa, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heavy Fabrication 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vulcraft Alabama Division of Nucor 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwest Steel Arizona Shop 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sabre Towers and Poles/Sabre Communications 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTHWEST FEED YARD 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Tulia 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDDEN CONCRETE INC 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beam Concrete Construction, Inc. 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beam Polish, LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR CalHar Construction, Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-TCR Varian, Schiller Park 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OHW 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Twinsburg Location 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vernon Hills 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Las Vegas 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill New Philadelphia Store & Office 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.S.G. Corporation 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE GI Tank 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.