Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Florida

CMC Rebar Orlando

Kissimmee, FL · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMC Rebar Orlando runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade B.

CMC Rebar Orlando: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMC Rebar Orlando safety composite

CMC Rebar Orlando scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

CMC Rebar Orlando injury rate improved

CMC Rebar Orlando's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Kissimmee, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/56
  • PHOTO Marbury Steel Fabric…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marbury Steel Fabricators, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

CMC Rebar Orlando in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMC Rebar Orlando averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMC Rebar Orlando TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CMC Rebar Orlando falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 56 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Florida.

CMC Rebar Orlando (37 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CMC Rebar Orlando
CMC Rebar Orlando (37 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

CMC Rebar Orlando has fewer employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2016 5.0 3.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · FL · Kissimmee

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 245 employers in Kissimmee, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marbury Steel Fabricators, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR W&W-AFCO Steel - Oklahoma City 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams Form Engineering Oregon 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Rebar Farmersville 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE TransGro 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packinghouse 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Park Service Center 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gladiolus Service Center 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention Center 1,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR OSCEOLA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1,660 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Osceola Hospital 1,617 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUNEAST 1,386 FTE
NAT-TCR Lithko Contracting, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Graber Crews 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1991 Marcus Ave 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Versant Power Hampden Operations Center 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Owens & Minor Portland 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryerson - Goldsboro 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta SE - 20 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE PaulB LLC Wholesale 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.