Distribution of electric power · Maine

CMP - Augusta General Office

Augusta, ME · ~401 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMP - Augusta General Office runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade A.

CMP - Augusta General Office: 0.4 TCR = 33% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMP - Augusta General Office safety composite

CMP - Augusta General Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CMP - Augusta General Office held a steady TCR band

CMP - Augusta General Office's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.4 in 2019 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.4 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Augusta, ME AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #1/28
  • PHOTO PM1 Pompano Beach Se…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~401 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PM1 Pompano Beach Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

CMP - Augusta General Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMP - Augusta General Office averages 0.4 TCR (33% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMP - Augusta General Office TCR series: 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 1.2

Where CMP - Augusta General Office falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 28 Distribution of electric power employers in Maine.

CMP - Augusta General Office (401 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMP - Augusta General Office
CMP - Augusta General Office (401 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CMP - Augusta General Office has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2020 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ME · Augusta

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 73 employers in Augusta, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PM1 Pompano Beach Service Center 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aberdeen Complex 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MDP Technology Center South 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wenwood 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE OTTO PIZZA 400 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hardwood Products Company LLC 403 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2013 399 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flagship Store 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR MaineGeneral Medical Center - Alfond Center for Health 2,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice Northcenter - 0710 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2046 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Northcenter - 0710 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Kendall (Miami) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Draeger Medical Systems, Inc. - Telford 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher Auto Parts - Reg 701 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alloyd Insulation Co Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chestnut Hill 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Deerfield Facility 401 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shape Corp - 1900 Hayes 401 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.