Distribution of electric power · Maine

CMP - Rockland Service Building

Rockland, ME · ~26 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMP - Rockland Service Building runs at 420% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

CMP - Rockland Service Building: 5.0 TCR = 420% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMP - Rockland Service Building safety composite

CMP - Rockland Service Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CMP - Rockland Service Building: 3.2 → 18.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2024

CMP - Rockland Service Building's TCR rose 15.3 from 3.2 in 2016 to 18.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Rockland, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.0 · 420% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #23/28
  • PHOTO Intercounty Electric…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Intercounty Electric Cooperative Association Inc. (Headquarters) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

CMP - Rockland Service Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMP - Rockland Service Building averages 5.0 TCR (420% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMP - Rockland Service Building TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=18.5 · BLS 1.2

Where CMP - Rockland Service Building falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 28 Distribution of electric power employers in Maine.

CMP - Rockland Service Building (26 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMP - Rockland Service Building
CMP - Rockland Service Building (26 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CMP - Rockland Service Building has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.5 3.1 6 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2018 12.9 6.5 3 1 0
2017 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ME · Rockland

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 41 employers in Rockland, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Intercounty Electric Cooperative Association Inc. (Headquarters) 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEC-Cedar Park 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAIN STREET 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyrulec Company 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Linkletter & Sons Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE ReGenerate Livermore Falls LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE ReEnergy Stratton LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMP - Farmington Service Building 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fisher Engineering 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR PBMC/Knox Center 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08230 - Store # 8230 Rockland 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8230 184 FTE
NAT-TCR DB05 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Collegeville 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NAG 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Intercounty Electric Cooperative Association Inc. (Headquarters) 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Branch 02 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Branch 42 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Welding Company of Ohio, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sweeney Water Treatment Plant 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.