Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · Colorado

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc.

Colorado Springs, CO · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. runs at 405% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc.: 11.8 TCR = 405% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. safety composite

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2022→2023

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. injury rate improved

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 12.4 in 2022 to 11.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.4 · 2023=11.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 405% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #19/20
  • PHOTO CA232
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA232 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. averages 11.8 TCR (405% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. TCR series: 2022=12.4 · 2023=11.1 · BLS 2.9

Where CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 20 Industrial building (except wa employers in Colorado.

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc.
CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

CMS of Colorado Springs, Inc. has fewer employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.1 7.4 3 0 0
2022 12.4 12.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · CO · Colorado Springs

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA232 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americase LLC 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roseburg Construction 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dogtown Truss & Components 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Palmer Lake 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHE - Castle Rock (CO001) 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glenwood Springs 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE 17W 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Millcreek Construction Group, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 151 McDonough 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J&J Machine llc 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE MEC Enterprises of Ocala LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Helmer Electric, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grayhawk, LLC - Louisville 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wichita Terminal 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.