Assisted Living · Minnesota

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living

Maple Grove, MN · ~71 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living runs at 309% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted Living workplace, earning a grade F.

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living: 11.8 TCR = 309% of Assisted Living BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living safety composite

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2017→2023

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living injury rate improved

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living's TCR fell 5.0 from 13.3 in 2017 to 8.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 25.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.3 · 2018=10.0 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=25.6 · 2023=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Maple Grove, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 309% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #190/240
  • PHOTO Discovery Village at…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Discovery Village at Stuart (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living averages 11.8 TCR (309% of the Assisted Living BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living TCR series: 2017=13.3 · 2018=10 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=11.2 · 2022=25.6 · 2023=8.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted Living establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #190 safest of 240 Assisted Living employers in Minnesota.

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living (71 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living
Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living (71 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Southview - Arbor Lakes Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted Living median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.3 8.3 0 3 0
2022 25.6 23.6 6 7 0
2021 11.2 7.5 6 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 4 4 0
2019 11.3 9.4 6 0 0
2018 10.0 6.0 5 0 0
2017 13.3 1.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Maple Grove

6,510 Assisted Living employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 238 employers in Maple Grove, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Discovery Village at Stuart 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Locust Grove 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of Centralia 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit of Winter Garden 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fagen, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donlar Construction Company 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanson Silo Company 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Corporation 5,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNMPL - MAPLE GROVE 932 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE GROVE (MNMPL) 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Millcreek Construction Group, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 151 McDonough 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JP Lamborn - Lakeland 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR J&J Machine llc 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bradford Electric Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waters 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morningview at Irving Park 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunter Prell Company 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.