Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Texas

CNS Logistics LLC

Richmond, TX · ~63 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CNS Logistics LLC runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

CNS Logistics LLC: 7.7 TCR = 118% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CNS Logistics LLC safety composite

CNS Logistics LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CNS Logistics LLC: 7.3 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.18× in 2024

CNS Logistics LLC's TCR rose 5.2 from 7.3 in 2022 to 12.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Richmond, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.7 · 118% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #213/463
  • PHOTO JJ Courier Services …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JJ Courier Services LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CNS Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CNS Logistics LLC averages 7.7 TCR (118% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CNS Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=7.3 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=12.4 · BLS 6.5

Where CNS Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #213 safest of 463 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Texas.

CNS Logistics LLC (63 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate CNS Logistics LLC
CNS Logistics LLC (63 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

CNS Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.4 1.4 9 0 0
2023 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2022 7.3 7.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · TX · Richmond

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 72 employers in Richmond, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JJ Courier Services LLC 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAN5 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 2298 ARMORY DR 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 100 E PHOENIX DRIVE 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Brazos Hatchery 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radiation Detection Company 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Plainview PLA1 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Major Oak Power 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU6 2,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR OakBend Medical Center 1,038 FTE
CITY-NEAR OAkbend Medical Center-Jackson Street Hospital Campus 814 FTE
CITY-NEAR OakBend Medical Center- Williams Way Hospital Campus 676 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAN5 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2722 Commerce Township 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Boiler Co Inc 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Food Stores 6243 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE MAS Building & Bridge Inc. - Bridge & Dam 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE V&S Lebanon Galvanizing LLC 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rieth-Riley - Goshen 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xanitos EVS at WVU Staffing 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.