Refrigerated warehousing · Illinois

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.

Hanover Park, IL · ~162 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Refrigerated warehousing workplace, earning a grade D.

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.: 10.4 TCR = 180% of Refrigerated warehousing BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. safety composite

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2016→2019

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. injury rate improved

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.0 from 18.0 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.0 · 2017=6.0 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Hanover Park, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.4 · 180% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #49/50
  • PHOTO Port of Morrow Wareh…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~162 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Port of Morrow Warehousing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. averages 10.4 TCR (180% of the Refrigerated warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. TCR series: 2016=18 · 2017=6 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=10 · BLS 5.8

Where Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 50 Refrigerated warehousing employers in Illinois.

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. (162 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.
Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. (162 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. has more employees than the Refrigerated warehousing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.0 10.0 9 0 0
2018 7.8 7.8 7 0 0
2017 6.0 6.0 15 0 0
2016 18.0 18.0 40 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · IL · Hanover Park

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 51 employers in Hanover Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Port of Morrow Warehousing 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Giant Cooling LLC 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tacoma - PRW 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americold Albertville, AL 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Miner Enterprises 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG CHI 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landmarc Environmental Systems, LLC 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prairie Farms Dairy Granite City 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pentair Filtration Solutions, LLC - Hanover Park 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR MWD 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Camcraft, Inc. 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanover Park 239 FTE
NAT-TCR Knouse Foods Coop, Inc - Gardners 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR McGill Hose 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0005 2810 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGB6 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Williamsburg Health & Rehabilitation Center 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wade Manufacturing Company: Rockingham Plant 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applied Health Services 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bedford Hts 162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.