MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Montana

Applied Health Services

Kalispell, MT · ~162 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Applied Health Services runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Applied Health Services: 3.1 TCR = 82% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Applied Health Services safety composite

Applied Health Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2019

Applied Health Services injury rate improved

Applied Health Services's TCR fell 0.6 from 4.5 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=1.0 · 2019=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Kalispell, MT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO 5806 Francis Lewis B…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~162 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5806 Francis Lewis Blvd (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Applied Health Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Applied Health Services averages 3.1 TCR (82% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Applied Health Services TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=1 · 2019=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Applied Health Services falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Montana.

Applied Health Services (162 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Applied Health Services
Applied Health Services (162 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Applied Health Services has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.9 0.0 3 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 4.5 2.5 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MT · Kalispell

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 117 employers in Kalispell, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5806 Francis Lewis Blvd 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webster City Clinic 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Springs 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northwest Community Healthcare Medical Group at 1450 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE S&K Logistics Services LLC 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE JM Services Crane & Rigging, LLC. 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE Billings 161 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS-0030-0030-01227 FAC-01227-BILLINGS-MT 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kalispell Regional Medical Center 2,715 FTE
CITY-NEAR Logan Health Medical Center (formerly Kalispell Regional Medical Center) 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Logan Health (formerly Kalispell Regional Healthcare-System) 494 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTK01, Applied Materials, Semi Tool Main 406 FTE
NAT-TCR Hickory Spinners 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tower Tech 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ardagh Metal Beverage-Chicago 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0017 1521 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sales - Palm Aire, Ft. Lauderdale 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryder Integrated Logistics 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wade Manufacturing Company: Rockingham Plant 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Co 31 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. 162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.