Distribution of electric power · Georgia

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway

Midway, GA · ~64 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway: 2.7 TCR = 223% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway safety composite

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway: 0.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway's TCR rose 3.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Midway, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 223% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #44/149
  • PHOTO Eversource - Yarmouth
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eversource - Yarmouth (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway averages 2.7 TCR (223% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3 · BLS 1.2

Where Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 149 Distribution of electric power employers in Georgia.

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway (64 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway
Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway (64 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 5.1 1.7 2 1 0
2020 3.2 0.0 1 1 0
2019 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 4.6 0.0 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · GA · Midway

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 17 employers in Midway, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Yarmouth 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Pioneer Electric Company Liberal District 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HAWKINS SERVICE CENTER 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUMA, Humacao Fleet Operations and Warehouse 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oakley Ind Operating - 7365 Oakley Industrial Blvd. Union City 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Operating 205 Dairy Pac Rd Athens 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE OREMC Nahunta 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON EMC - GAINESVILLE 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3808 - Midway GA DC 1,456 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3808 - Midway DC 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howmet Aerospace Savannah Operations 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midway - GA 104 FTE
NAT-TCR HAECO Airframe Services - Lake City 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR M&F Litteken 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cooper Steel 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Equipment Corporation New Bremen 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bass Corrosion Services, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - LSV 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Steel Works, Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hallmark Metamora Fixture Operations 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.