Distribution of electric power · Texas

Hawkins Service Center

El Paso, TX · ~75 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hawkins Service Center runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Hawkins Service Center: 2.7 TCR = 223% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hawkins Service Center safety composite

Hawkins Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hawkins Service Center held a steady TCR band

Hawkins Service Center's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.7 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · El Paso, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.7 · 223% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #176/246
  • PHOTO Coastal Electric Coo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Hawkins Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hawkins Service Center averages 2.7 TCR (223% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hawkins Service Center TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Hawkins Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #176 safest of 246 Distribution of electric power employers in Texas.

Hawkins Service Center (75 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hawkins Service Center
Hawkins Service Center (75 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Hawkins Service Center has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.5 0.0 5 0 0
2017 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 2.7 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TX · El Paso

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coastal Electric Cooperative Midway 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Yarmouth 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Pioneer Electric Company Liberal District 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUMA, Humacao Fleet Operations and Warehouse 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crownover Farms dba Lone Star Family Farms 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village farms Marfa 1 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rice, TX 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE CACTUS OPERATING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Payette, ID 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy Willard Hospital 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RCN Telecom Services, LLC-Havertown 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brent-B5510-Afh- Brentwood Store 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sms 1703 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Mines Health Center - Potosi 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Supply - Chester Yard 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smartlam NA, LLC 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.