Electrical contractors · Georgia

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc

Pooler, GA · ~54 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc: 5.4 TCR = 193% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc safety composite

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.8

2017→2024

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc injury rate improved

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc's TCR fell 20.8 from 24.1 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 24.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=24.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Pooler, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #112/131
  • PHOTO TRI-STATE ELECTRIC, …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TRI-STATE ELECTRIC, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc averages 5.4 TCR (193% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc TCR series: 2017=24.1 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=1 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 131 Electrical contractors employers in Georgia.

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc (54 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc
Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc (54 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Coastal Electric of Georgia, Inc has fewer employees than the Electrical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 1.6 2 0 0
2023 3.3 1.6 2 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2021 3.1 2.1 3 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.7 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 24.1 4.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · GA · Pooler

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 80 employers in Pooler, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TRI-STATE ELECTRIC, INC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAAM Electric Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1-ACI-Grand Rapids 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashland, VA 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camilla Hatchery 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blairsville Hatchery 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Notch Electric Membership Coperation 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walton EMC - Snellville Office 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAV4 2,227 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-WSNC 799 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAV7 729 FTE
CITY-NEAR JCB INC 683 FTE
NAT-TCR Inductotherm Corp. 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LVMPD - DSD - Clark County Detention Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1805 Lucas Lane 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Durham, Inc 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Woodbridge 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Galleria Park Hotel 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-State Commodities, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kincaid Plastics Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.