Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers · New Hampshire

Coastal Specialty Forest Products

Bow, NH · ~178 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coastal Specialty Forest Products runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Coastal Specialty Forest Products: 7.1 TCR = 324% of Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coastal Specialty Forest Products safety composite

Coastal Specialty Forest Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2019→2021

Coastal Specialty Forest Products injury rate improved

Coastal Specialty Forest Products's TCR fell 3.1 from 8.4 in 2019 to 5.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=8.4 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Bow, NH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 324% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Tucker - Columbia
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tucker - Columbia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Coastal Specialty Forest Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coastal Specialty Forest Products averages 7.1 TCR (324% of the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coastal Specialty Forest Products TCR series: 2019=8.4 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=5.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Coastal Specialty Forest Products falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe employers in New Hampshire.

Coastal Specialty Forest Products (178 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Coastal Specialty Forest Products
Coastal Specialty Forest Products (178 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Coastal Specialty Forest Products has more employees than the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.3 2.0 8 0 0
2020 7.7 3.9 12 0 0
2019 8.4 1.9 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · NH · Bow

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 40 employers in Bow, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tucker - Columbia 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wm. S. Trimble Co., Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4192-00051484-32 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BlueLinx Corporation Tulsa 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE At Machine - M37 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hampstead Hospital 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Concord 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Community - Laconia 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amoskeag Beverages, LLC 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR AmoskeagBeveragesLLC 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR R.S. Audley, Inc. 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bow - 1403 Route 3A 118 FTE
NAT-TCR Ashton Court Care and Rehab 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Reasors19 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Prairie County Hospital District 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NOA Medical Industries, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coen Energy 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Alpha EMC 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shorr Packaging Corp - Aurora 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Foods 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.