Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing · New York

Cobham Motion Control

Hauppauge, NY · ~120 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cobham Motion Control runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Cobham Motion Control: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cobham Motion Control safety composite

Cobham Motion Control scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cobham Motion Control: 1.4 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Cobham Motion Control's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.4 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Hauppauge, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO RAM Camp
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RAM Camp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Cobham Motion Control in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cobham Motion Control averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cobham Motion Control TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Cobham Motion Control falls in its industry

222 Motors, electric (except engin establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Motors, electric (except engin employers in New York.

Cobham Motion Control (120 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Cobham Motion Control
Cobham Motion Control (120 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Cobham Motion Control has more employees than the Motors, electric (except engine starting median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.0 0.0 1 1 0
2016 1.4 0.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · NY · Hauppauge

222 Motors, electric (except engine starting motors, gearmotors, outboard), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 154 employers in Hauppauge, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RAM Camp 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evans Corporate 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marion - 510 Rockwell Drive 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR INDUSTRIAL COIL INC 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nesbitt Fruit Farms 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Facility Management & Construction Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Power Inc-NY-Canton 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peckham Road Corp 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Care Alliance of NY HQ Hauppauge 990 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teachers Federal Credit Union 786 FTE
CITY-NEAR RECONN 9009 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR CONTRACT PHARMACAL CORP 691 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Office 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR USS Fairfield Works - Tubular 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago-Scs (Ilcst) 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Scs Mira Loma Ii - 4037 (Camlm) 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Highway 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE South 501 MNE8 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Arlington 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE MS - Fallon, NV - 1FAN1 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.