Conservation and reclamation agencies · Arizona

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office

Name: Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Flagstaff, AZ · ~89 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.1
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade B.

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office: 2.1 TCR = 64% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office safety composite

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers
DART rate: D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office held a steady TCR band

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.9 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.9 · 2023=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Flagstaff, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 64% of ind

DART 2.2 DART
RANK #2/20
PHOTO Parks and Recreation
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parks and Recreation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.1
Greater Vallej

2.1
Table Rock Sta

2.1
Dept. of Fish

2.1
Parks and Recr

2

What this shows Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office averages 2.1 TCR (64% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office TCR series: 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 20 Conservation and reclamation a employers in Arizona.

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office (89 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Coconino National Forest Supervisor's Office has more employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	2.2	2.2	1	1	0
2022	1.9	0.0	0	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · AZ · Flagstaff

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 181 employers in Flagstaff, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Parks and Recreation	NEW BERN, NC	2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Greater Vallejo Recreation District	VALLEJO, CA	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Table Rock State Park	PICKENS, SC	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Dept. of Fish & Game (18)	HOMER, AK	2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Meritage Homes of the Carolinas	SCOTTSDALE	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Meritage Homes of the Carolinas - Raleigh Division	SCOTTSDALE	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	City of Kingman Public Works	KINGMAN	89 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Lyonsroofing	PHX	89 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Northern Arizona University	Flagstaff	7,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Northern Arizona Healthcare	Flagstaff	4,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Coconino County Board of Supervisors	Flagstaff	1,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR	City of Flagstaff	Flagstaff	1,075 FTE
NAT-TCR	J & L Holdings Inc	Lynnwood, WA	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	GM Bedford Foundry	Bedford, IN	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Storage Express Management LLC	Bloomington, IN	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Atomic Distributing Company	Huntington, WV	2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	MPH	Hamden, CT	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Stop & Shop 2411	Somerville, MA	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Stop & Shop 0422	Edgartown, MA	89 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Heritage Healthcare of Hammond	Hammond, LA	89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.