Skilled nursing facilities · Idaho

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia

Coeur D'Alene, ID · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia: 17.3 TCR = 267% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia safety composite

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2018→2023

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia injury rate improved

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia's TCR fell 4.6 from 11.9 in 2018 to 7.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 32.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.9 · 2020=32.7 · 2023=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Coeur D'Alene, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 267% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #87/94
  • PHOTO Clarkfield Care Center
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clarkfield Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia averages 17.3 TCR (267% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia TCR series: 2018=11.9 · 2020=32.7 · 2023=7.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 94 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Idaho.

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia (61 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia
Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia (61 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Coeur D'Alene Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.3 4.4 5 0 0
2020 32.7 32.7 0 19 0
2018 11.9 11.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · ID · Coeur D'Alene

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 44 employers in Coeur D'Alene, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clarkfield Care Center 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bon Secours Maria Manor 2300 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Center at Northridge 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medilodge of Lansing 17.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gehring Agri Business 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gooding Farms Inc 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van Beek Dairy 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2407-Filer, ID 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0773 - COEUR D'ALENE ID WHSE 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0679 - Coeur d'Alene 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Idaho Distributing 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifecare Center of Coeur D'Alene 144 FTE
NAT-TCR Clarkfield Care Center 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Linda Manor Assisted Living Center 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-00462 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 129 Santa Ana 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lithia Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram of Spokane 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Electric Inc 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camanche 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centerlight Healthcare Stillwell 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.