Detention centers · Nevada

COH Water Treatment Plant

Henderson, NV · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

COH Water Treatment Plant runs at 446% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Detention centers workplace, earning a grade F.

COH Water Treatment Plant: 14.3 TCR = 446% of Detention centers BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

COH Water Treatment Plant safety composite

COH Water Treatment Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

COH Water Treatment Plant injury rate improved

COH Water Treatment Plant's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 43.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=34.2 · 2018=27.9 · 2019=43.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Henderson, NV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 446% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO DCYF Green Hill
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DCYF Green Hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

COH Water Treatment Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows COH Water Treatment Plant averages 14.3 TCR (446% of the Detention centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

COH Water Treatment Plant TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=34.2 · 2018=27.9 · 2019=43.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where COH Water Treatment Plant falls in its industry

482 Detention centers establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Detention centers employers in Nevada.

COH Water Treatment Plant (31 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate COH Water Treatment Plant
COH Water Treatment Plant (31 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

COH Water Treatment Plant has fewer employees than the Detention centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2022 6.9 6.9 1 0 0
2021 7.8 7.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 43.5 36.2 6 0 0
2018 27.9 20.9 4 0 0
2017 34.2 20.5 5 0 0
2016 2.4 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · NV · Henderson

482 Detention centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 391 employers in Henderson, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DCYF Green Hill 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Probation JJC 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ironwood State Prison 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeland Correctional Facility 14.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smith Valley Dairy Corp. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harmony Homes Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reno Door & Trim 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ute, Inc. 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LAS1 3,260 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030521 2,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dignity Health St Rose Dominican-Siena 2,240 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030521-521001 2,165 FTE
NAT-TCR Broward County - BSO North 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Landing at Stone Oak 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Lake Bluff- Fire 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1001 Erie School District 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookfield 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bellofram Acquisition II LLC, DBA Whittle & Neher Company 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windsorwood Place 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.