Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing · Michigan

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth

Plymouth, MI · ~102 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth safety composite

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2022

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth injury rate improved

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Plymouth, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/58
  • PHOTO DEVELOPMENTAL INDUST…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DEVELOPMENTAL INDUSTRIES INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth falls in its industry

391 Machine tools, metal cutting, establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 58 Machine tools, metal cutting, employers in Michigan.

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth (102 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth
Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth (102 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Coherent - Rofin - Plymouth has more employees than the Machine tools, metal cutting, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · MI · Plymouth

391 Machine tools, metal cutting, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 139 employers in Plymouth, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DEVELOPMENTAL INDUSTRIES INC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ready Technology Inc 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AIDA- America 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prima Power Laserdyne 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Constantine, MI 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Grand Rapids-Water Administration 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&D Hughes, Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMF Group Inc Michigan 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADIENT LLC Headquarters 1,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Webasto Roof Systems Inc. 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Comprehensive Care Services, Inc. 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR 11021 648 FTE
NAT-TCR Infiniti of Hoffman Estates 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Steel Alloys & Services 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine Forest Complex 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vision Quality Components, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elkhart Main 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royse City Medical Lodge 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rhb - Win 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0747 Indiana Packers Corporation 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.