Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel · North Carolina

Coilplus North Carolina

Greensboro, NC · ~63 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coilplus North Carolina runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade D.

Coilplus North Carolina: 6.1 TCR = 184% of Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coilplus North Carolina safety composite

Coilplus North Carolina scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coilplus North Carolina: 1.5 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2021

Coilplus North Carolina's TCR rose 0.7 from 1.5 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 184% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK P30
  • PHOTO 4004 - Eau Claire St…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4004 - Eau Claire Steel Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Coilplus North Carolina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coilplus North Carolina averages 6.1 TCR (184% of the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coilplus North Carolina TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2018=11.9 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Coilplus North Carolina falls in its industry

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Coilplus North Carolina (63 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Coilplus North Carolina
Coilplus North Carolina (63 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Coilplus North Carolina has fewer employees than the Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, pl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2020 3.5 1.8 2 0 0
2019 11.2 4.5 3 2 0
2018 11.9 6.0 10 0 0
2016 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · NC · Greensboro

206 Cold rolling steel shapes (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, strip) made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4004 - Eau Claire Steel Plant 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCSP Holdco, LLC 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SET Advanced Metal Processing 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bar Processing Corp 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smith Energy Complex 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union Power Cooperative - Oakboro 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asheboro Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH DURHAM OPERATIONS 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Schaafsma Heating & Cooling, LLC 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Central State Distributors 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Medical Foundation (185-306) 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR L&M Corrugated Container Corp West 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fluke Electronics- Keene 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haviland Plastics Products 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanical Systems & Service, LLC 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Traverse City Products LLC 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.