Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Pennsylvania

Colonial Park Care Center

Harrisburg, PA · ~176 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Colonial Park Care Center runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Colonial Park Care Center: 8.7 TCR = 134% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Colonial Park Care Center safety composite

Colonial Park Care Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2021

Colonial Park Care Center injury rate improved

Colonial Park Care Center's TCR fell 6.3 from 10.5 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 22.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.5 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=22.9 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Harrisburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.7 · 134% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #483/754
  • PHOTO Forest City Nursing …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 82 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forest City Nursing & Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Colonial Park Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Colonial Park Care Center averages 8.7 TCR (134% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Colonial Park Care Center TCR series: 2016=10.5 · 2017=8 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=22.9 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=4.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Colonial Park Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #483 safest of 754 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Pennsylvania.

Colonial Park Care Center (176 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Colonial Park Care Center
Colonial Park Care Center (176 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Colonial Park Care Center has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.2 4.2 6 0 0
2020 6.1 6.1 9 0 0
2019 22.9 18.9 34 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2017 8.0 7.4 13 0 0
2016 10.5 8.3 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Harrisburg

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 362 employers in Harrisburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forest City Nursing & Rehabilitation 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Terrace of McHenry Rehabilitation Center 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHINGTON CARE CENTER 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Life Services Chicora 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Swartley Bros. Engineers, Inc 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renick Brothers Construction 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Secant Group 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stryten Energy 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle Hospitals 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHS/HARRISBURG HOSPITAL 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pinnacle Health Medical Services 2,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Pinnacle 2,311 FTE
NAT-TCR The G.C. Broach Company - Shop 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Reasors13 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Impact Winsted 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Thrift Store-San Jose 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drivers 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE V3 Companies - Woodridge 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Essentra HPC Manati 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1009 - Montgomery Al Whse 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.