Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants · Colorado

Colorado Lamb Processors

Brush, CO · ~80 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Colorado Lamb Processors runs at 333% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade F.

Colorado Lamb Processors: 11.0 TCR = 333% of Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Colorado Lamb Processors safety composite

Colorado Lamb Processors scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.8

2021→2024

Colorado Lamb Processors injury rate improved

Colorado Lamb Processors's TCR fell 10.8 from 10.8 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.8 · 2022=13.4 · 2023=19.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Brush, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 333% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO nebraska beef
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: nebraska beef (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Colorado Lamb Processors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Colorado Lamb Processors averages 11.0 TCR (333% of the Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Colorado Lamb Processors TCR series: 2021=10.8 · 2022=13.4 · 2023=19.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Colorado Lamb Processors falls in its industry

212 Lamb carcasses, half carcasses establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Lamb carcasses, half carcasses employers in Colorado.

Colorado Lamb Processors (80 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Colorado Lamb Processors
Colorado Lamb Processors (80 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Colorado Lamb Processors has fewer employees than the Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 19.7 6.6 9 0 0
2022 13.4 3.8 6 1 0
2021 10.8 5.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · CO · Brush

212 Lamb carcasses, half carcasses, primal and sub-primal cuts, produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 12 employers in Brush, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR nebraska beef 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dietz and Watson Baltimore 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hatfield Facility 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harris Ranch Beef Company 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yampa Valley Electric Association 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arlun Inc 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Colorado 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrated Water Services, Inc. 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eben Ezer Lutheran Care Center 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pawnee Station 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Platte Health & Rehabilitation Center 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brush Meat Processors 76 FTE
NAT-TCR Craig Industries 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CAN050 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Laurels of West Carrollton 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bayside Best Beans LLC. 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bryn Mawr 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bancroft 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quakertown Distribution Center 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skanska Manafort JV / Providence I-95 NB Viaduct 90008190 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.