Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction · Colorado

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station

Colorado Springs, CO · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station: 1.0 TCR = 35% of Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station safety composite

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2018

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station injury rate improved

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 35% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/65
  • PHOTO United Utility - Pla…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Utility - Plaska (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Colorado Springs - Nixon Station averages 1.0 TCR (35% of the Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Colorado Springs - Nixon Station falls in its industry

1,605 Power and Communication Line a establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 65 Power and Communication Line a employers in Colorado.

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station (42 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Colorado Springs - Nixon Station
Colorado Springs - Nixon Station (42 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Colorado Springs - Nixon Station has fewer employees than the Power and Communication Line and Related median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CO · Colorado Springs

1,605 Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Utility - Plaska 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forbes Bros. Timberline Construction, Inc. DBA FB Timberline 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR R&R Ditching Service Inc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Region 204 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MiNDFUL - Holly 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE WLM Limon Wind Plant 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sangre de Cristo Association 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sangre de Cristo Electric Association 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Linde - HYCO Clear Lake 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HoneywellRI13 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA.CONCO.9 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TN.FRANK.7 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Inland Waste Solutions Bethel Heights 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisiana - 203 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunter Douglas Window Designs LLC - Wisconsin 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.