District and regional offices · South Carolina

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office

Columbia, SC · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office runs at 329% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical District and regional offices workplace, earning a grade F.

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office: 2.3 TCR = 329% of District and regional offices BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office safety composite

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office held a steady TCR band

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Columbia, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.3 · 329% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/17
  • PHOTO Corporate Office
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office averages 2.3 TCR (329% of the District and regional offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.9 · 2018=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office falls in its industry

1,475 District and regional offices establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 17 District and regional offices employers in South Carolina.

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office (42 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office
Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office (42 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Lutheran Family Services - Columbia Office has fewer employees than the District and regional offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.9 0.0 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · SC · Columbia

1,475 District and regional offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHKD Townebank Tower 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Health System Office (470-6332) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Virginia Support Center Headquarters-6301 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Titan Production Company, LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newberry Electric Cooperative,Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Resource Center PNG 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Group South Carolina, LLC- Charleston Division 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Parkside at Dr King School and HWS 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fuel Total Systems Kentucky Corporaton 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Allied Corporate Services 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TMI International LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colorado Springs - Nixon Station 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inland Waste Solutions Bethel Heights 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisiana - 203 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunter Douglas Window Designs LLC - Wisconsin 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.