Hammer forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Indiana

Columbus Manufacturing Facility

Columbus, IN · ~230 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus Manufacturing Facility runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hammer forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade D.

Columbus Manufacturing Facility: 4.4 TCR = 135% of Hammer forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus Manufacturing Facility safety composite

Columbus Manufacturing Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2021

Columbus Manufacturing Facility injury rate improved

Columbus Manufacturing Facility's TCR fell 1.4 from 5.4 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Columbus, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 135% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO ALRY TOOL & DIE CO.,…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~230 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ALRY TOOL & DIE CO., INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Columbus Manufacturing Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus Manufacturing Facility averages 4.4 TCR (135% of the Hammer forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus Manufacturing Facility TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Columbus Manufacturing Facility falls in its industry

241 Hammer forgings made from purc establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Hammer forgings made from purc employers in Indiana.

Columbus Manufacturing Facility (230 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus Manufacturing Facility
Columbus Manufacturing Facility (230 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Columbus Manufacturing Facility has more employees than the Hammer forgings made from purchased iron median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 1.6 8 2 0
2020 3.9 1.1 6 1 0
2016 5.4 3.1 14 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · IN · Columbus

241 Hammer forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 141 employers in Columbus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ALRY TOOL & DIE CO., INC. 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Forge & Steel Lima, Ohio 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Green Components 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Xtek Inc 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CMH Manufacturing West Inc. Plant 981 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE Exelead, Inc 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens-Illinois, Inc. Lapel Plant#8 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEW NELLO OPERATING CO LLC 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Material Handling, Inc. 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR NTN Driveshaft Inc. 1,756 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Engine Plant 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons Office Building 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR Pallet Consultants 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Shared Lab, LLC (470-8817) 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Production Support Services 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Vecellio & Grogan-Beckley Repair Shop 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dover Pearland Operations (B&C) 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodridge 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE HHHC 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3UC AvL Technologies 230 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.