Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Indiana

NTN Driveshaft Inc.

Columbus, IN · ~1,756 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NTN Driveshaft Inc. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

NTN Driveshaft Inc.: 3.6 TCR = 68% of Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NTN Driveshaft Inc. safety composite

NTN Driveshaft Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2016→2024

NTN Driveshaft Inc. injury rate improved

NTN Driveshaft Inc.'s TCR fell 4.3 from 6.2 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Columbus, IN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #28/41
  • PHOTO Trailer Axle Assembly
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 348 inj
  • SIZE ~1,756 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trailer Axle Assembly (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

NTN Driveshaft Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NTN Driveshaft Inc. averages 3.6 TCR (68% of the Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NTN Driveshaft Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 5.4

Where NTN Driveshaft Inc. falls in its industry

320 Drive shafts and half shafts, establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 41 Drive shafts and half shafts, employers in Indiana.

NTN Driveshaft Inc. (1,756 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate NTN Driveshaft Inc.
NTN Driveshaft Inc. (1,756 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

NTN Driveshaft Inc. has more employees than the Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.1 34 0 0
2023 1.4 1.1 28 0 0
2022 3.1 1.4 65 0 0
2021 3.6 1.8 54 4 0
2020 5.7 3.5 68 6 0
2016 6.2 4.2 99 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · IN · Columbus

320 Drive shafts and half shafts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 141 employers in Columbus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trailer Axle Assembly 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jasper Weller, LLC - DBA Weller Truck Parts (Grandville) 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Deere Coffeyville Works 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danville Machining 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE INFLD - PLAINFIELD 1,747 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Hospital 1,776 FTE
STATE-SIZE INEVA13 ASCENSION ST VINCENT EVANSVILLE 1,778 FTE
STATE-SIZE French Lick Resort 1,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Material Handling, Inc. 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Engine Plant 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons Office Building 1,248 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cummins Technical Center 1,174 FTE
NAT-TCR 259-NiSource-Springfield OH 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arroyo Vista Nursing Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR S03170 - IA Mason City 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0059 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Remote Sites 1,756 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospitality & Real Estate: Destination Kohler 1,755 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2039-BRAVES-MAJOR 1,757 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.