Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · Georgia

Columbus (SSE)

Columbus, GA · ~22 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus (SSE) runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Columbus (SSE): 0.6 TCR = 27% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus (SSE) safety composite

Columbus (SSE) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2024

Columbus (SSE) injury rate improved

Columbus (SSE)'s TCR fell 5.4 from 5.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Columbus, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/49
  • PHOTO SMM Group SMR Palm B…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SMM Group SMR Palm Beach (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Columbus (SSE) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus (SSE) averages 0.6 TCR (27% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus (SSE) TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Columbus (SSE) falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 49 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in Georgia.

Columbus (SSE) (22 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus (SSE)
Columbus (SSE) (22 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Columbus (SSE) has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.4 5.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · GA · Columbus

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SMM Group SMR Palm Beach 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cirba Solutions Services US, LLC. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange Recycling Services, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sims Metal Management - Redwood City, CA 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Little Creek Ag LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jason Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Algae Energy Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE DIRT MOVERS 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR Monroe Power Plant 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kalkaska Service Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WALTHAM 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Greeno Road 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Means Nursery Inc (River Road) 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE DSI Wellington 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huffman's Farm & Home - Fort Madison, IA 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shop 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.