Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Michigan
Monroe Power Plant
Monroe, MI · ~495 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.6
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Monroe Power Plant runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.
Monroe Power Plant: 0.6 TCR = 50% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Monroe Power Plant safety composite
Monroe Power Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
61/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- B 0.6 per 100 workers
Safer than 84% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 0.22 per 100 workers
Safer than 41% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Monroe Power Plant held a steady TCR band
Monroe Power Plant's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.2 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=0.2 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.2
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 221112 · Monroe, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID
Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 50% of ind
- DART 0.2 DART
- RANK #2/24
- PHOTO Westbrook Energy Cen…
- BOOK 9y book
- INJ 23 inj
- SIZE ~495 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Westbrook Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →
Monroe Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Monroe Power Plant
0.6 TCR
- Westbrook Ener
Westbrook Energy Center
0.6 TCR
- COLUMBIA ENERG
COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER
0.6 TCR
- NAES : Sandy C
NAES : Sandy Creek
0.6 TCR
- Cliffside Stea
Cliffside Steam Station
0.6 TCR
What this shows Monroe Power Plant averages 0.6 TCR (50% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).
Monroe Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0.2 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 1.2
Where Monroe Power Plant falls in its industry
846 Electric power generation, fos establishmentsSafer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.
Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 24 Electric power generation, fos employers in Michigan.
Monroe Power Plant has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
221112 · MI · Monroe
846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 96 employers in Monroe, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Westbrook Energy Center | 0.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER | 0.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | NAES : Sandy Creek | 0.6 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Cliffside Steam Station | 0.6 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Feyen Zylstra | 495 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Grand Traverse Band Ottawa and Chippewa Indians/EDC East | 495 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Ideal Contracting, L.L.C. | 494 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Nestle Gerber Products Company | 496 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Monroe Regional Hospital | 1,041 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Frenchtown | 658 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Gerdau - Monroe Mill | 514 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Monroe Location - DRIV AUTOMOTIVE INC | 441 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Columbus (SSE) | 0.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Villa Rica Csb (4) | 0.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | WALTHAM | 0.6 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Greeno Road | 0.6 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Sarasota | 495 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Vehicle Service Group | 495 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | 2193 - Maple Grove North | 495 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Hilscher-Clarke Electric | 495 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.