Employer · New York

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA

Buffalo, NY · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA: 4.2 TCR = 200% of industry BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA safety composite

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA held a steady TCR band

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.1 in 2018 to 4.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.1 · 2019=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Buffalo, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.2 · 200% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #38/67
  • PHOTO Soles Electric Compa…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Soles Electric Company Fairmont (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA averages 4.2 TCR (200% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA TCR series: 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA falls in its industry

2,560 industry establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 67 industry employers in New York.

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA (47 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA
Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA (47 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-CT/NY/VT District : SVC-Buffalo NY-USA has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.4 2.2 2 0 0
2018 4.1 4.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NY · Buffalo

2,560 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 532 employers in Buffalo, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Soles Electric Company Fairmont 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lavergne 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbon Yorba Linda 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upper Marlboro15 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Bliss, NY 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brightly Farms, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Jacket Orchards 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barbland Dairy LLC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buffalo General Hospital 3,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital of Buffalo 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR WNY Independent Living, Inc. 1,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaleida Health Oishei Childrens Hospital 1,765 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Creek 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Precision Anodizing, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa Community Hospital 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0029 2338 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garratt-Callahn Company Ad 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospital Couriers Florida (North) 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospital Couriers Dallas 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynegy Moss Landing LLC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.