Employer · Texas

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA

Austin, TX · ~58 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA: 0.5 TCR = 22% of industry BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA safety composite

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA held a steady TCR band

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/292
  • PHOTO Memphis / Bartlett
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Memphis / Bartlett (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA averages 0.5 TCR (22% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA falls in its industry

2,560 industry establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 292 industry employers in Texas.

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA (58 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA
Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA (58 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Texas District : SVC-Austin TX-USA has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · Austin

2,560 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Memphis / Bartlett 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baton Rouge Branch 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unity Lab Services 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augusta EM/Rental 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cactus Feedyard 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flatonia Farm Plant 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waelder 2 Complex 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Complex 1 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR KraftHeinz Mason City Iowa 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Keystone Bolt & Nut Co. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Stores Building 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CSC Bluefield 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avon Lea Assisted Living Facility 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marks Brothers, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE CE White - Ohio 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sir Raleigh Electric, Inc 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.