Refrigerators (e.g., reach-in, walk-in), commercial-type, merchant wholesalers · California

Commercial Cooling

City of Industry, CA · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commercial Cooling runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Refrigerators (e.g., reach-in, walk-in), commercial-type, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Commercial Cooling: 4.3 TCR = 129% of Refrigerators (e.g., reach-in, walk-in), commercial-type, merchant wholesalers BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commercial Cooling safety composite

Commercial Cooling scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Commercial Cooling held a steady TCR band

Commercial Cooling's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=6.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · City of Industry, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 129% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/19
  • PHOTO DriSteem Corporation
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DriSteem Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Commercial Cooling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commercial Cooling averages 4.3 TCR (129% of the Refrigerators (e.g., reach-in, walk-in), commercial-type, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commercial Cooling TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=6.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Commercial Cooling falls in its industry

461 Refrigerators (e.g., reach-in, establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 19 Refrigerators (e.g., reach-in, employers in California.

Commercial Cooling (43 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Commercial Cooling
Commercial Cooling (43 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Commercial Cooling has fewer employees than the Refrigerators (e.g., reach-in, walk-in), median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2020 6.6 6.6 3 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 3 0 0
2018 9.6 9.6 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · CA · City of Industry

461 Refrigerators (e.g., reach-in, walk-in), commercial-type, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 226 employers in City of Industry, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DriSteem Corporation 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kentuckiana Curb Company 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ClimateCraft 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Airxcel Inc. 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Sandra Garcia Farming Partnership 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARVIN ADMINISTRATION 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald W Beeman 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE KG Vineyard Management, LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morrow-Meadows Corporation 1,879 FTE
CITY-NEAR 050109-INDUSTRY CA P&DC 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR INDUSTRY_1441491 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kellwood Apparel, LLC 489 FTE
NAT-TCR Elk River Ford, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Zimbrick East Side 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas North 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Midway 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE WMC Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1990 Janice Ave. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04011 - WI Fond du Lac 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE S04915 - WM of Pharr 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.