Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture · Virginia

Commercial Vehicle Group

Dublin, VA · ~87 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commercial Vehicle Group runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade B.

Commercial Vehicle Group: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commercial Vehicle Group safety composite

Commercial Vehicle Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

Commercial Vehicle Group injury rate improved

Commercial Vehicle Group's TCR fell 5.0 from 6.0 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336120 · Dublin, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Sutphen Urbana
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sutphen Urbana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Commercial Vehicle Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commercial Vehicle Group averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commercial Vehicle Group TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=1 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Commercial Vehicle Group falls in its industry

124 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, employers in Virginia.

Commercial Vehicle Group (87 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Commercial Vehicle Group
Commercial Vehicle Group (87 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Commercial Vehicle Group has fewer employees than the Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.9 4.9 2 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2018 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2017 4.7 1.2 4 0 0
2016 6.0 1.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336120 · VA · Dublin

124 Assembly plants, heavy trucks, and buses on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 28 employers in Dublin, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sutphen Urbana 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mt. Holly 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Drive Plants 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DYNACRAFT, A PACCAR COMPANY. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Solo, Inc. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tribble Electric Inc. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Paneling Specialties, Inc. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Brewing - Richmond 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Volvo Trucks NA New River Valley Plant 3,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Packaging Operations 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1652 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1652 267 FTE
NAT-TCR Carey Electric Contracting, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Michael L. Shular DBA Best Western Newport Inn 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Symbotic Bethlehem 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RI-East 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Rural Electric Cooperative 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE VDF Farm Plant 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ebsary Foundation Company 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reidsville 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.