Water treatment and distribution · South Carolina

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville

Greenville, SC · ~250 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville: 2.9 TCR = 238% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville safety composite

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2022→2024

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville injury rate improved

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville's TCR fell 2.6 from 4.3 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.3 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.9 · 238% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #5/20
  • PHOTO Jefferson City WTP
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~250 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jefferson City WTP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville averages 2.9 TCR (238% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville TCR series: 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 20 Water treatment and distributi employers in South Carolina.

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville (250 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville
Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville (250 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Commissioners of Public Works of Greenville has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 4 0 0
2023 2.6 1.3 6 0 0
2022 4.3 1.9 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · SC · Greenville

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jefferson City WTP 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Department of Public Utilities - Water 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Pollution Control Plant 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Connecticut Water 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE USA Bennettsville SC Oak River South 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2832 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4210_8303 251 FTE
STATE-SIZE BE Aerospace - Simpsonville 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Storage Asset Management, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Copper Moon Coffee LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilo-ITO 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Huffcutt Concrete 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oscar Orduno Inc. 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE S&H Express 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE East West Express Inc. 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rotary Corporation 250 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.