Real estate (except cemeteries) subdividers · Minnesota

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites

Saint Paul, MN · ~256 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Real estate (except cemeteries) subdividers workplace, earning a grade B.

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites: 2.0 TCR = 70% of Real estate (except cemeteries) subdividers BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites safety composite

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites: 1.6 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.2× in 2024

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites's TCR rose 0.7 from 1.6 in 2023 to 2.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237210 · Saint Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Toscana Limited
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~256 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toscana Limited (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites averages 2.0 TCR (70% of the Real estate (except cemeteries) subdividers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites TCR series: 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites falls in its industry

62 Real estate (except cemeteries establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Real estate (except cemeteries employers in Minnesota.

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites (256 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites
CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites (256 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.7

CommonBond: Corporate, AS, Small Sites has more employees than the Real estate (except cemeteries) subdivid median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.4 4 2 0
2023 1.6 0.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237210 · MN · Saint Paul

62 Real estate (except cemeteries) subdividers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toscana Limited 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR the kearney companies LLC. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Granite Excavation Inc Cascade 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate & Shop 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Saint Paul - Saint Paul Regional Water Services 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE CommonBond: Skyline 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan's Prize Long Prairie 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legendary Baking Chaska 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR Rich Products Gallatin 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Mechanical LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Randall Manufacturing 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus 10409 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Hyatt Denver 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chemtech Plastics Inc. 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Falls 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE AmesburyTruth 256 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.