assisted living community · Virginia

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff

Cedar Bluff, VA · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff runs at 368% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical assisted living community workplace, earning a grade F.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff: 14.0 TCR = 368% of assisted living community BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff safety composite

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff: 3.7 → 23.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 57.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2024

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff's TCR rose 20.3 from 3.7 in 2016 to 23.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 57.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cedar Bluff, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.0 · 368% of ind

  • DART 20.9 DART
  • RANK #167/199
  • PHOTO Sterling Inn
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sterling Inn (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff averages 14.0 TCR (368% of the assisted living community BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=17.3 · 2022=57.4 · 2023=43.2 · 2024=23.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff falls in its industry

6,510 assisted living community establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #167 safest of 199 assisted living community employers in Virginia.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff (44 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff
Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff (44 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff has fewer employees than the assisted living community median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 23.9 20.9 5 3 0
2023 43.2 43.2 1 16 0
2022 57.4 57.4 0 23 0
2021 17.3 14.8 1 6 0
2020 7.3 7.3 0 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Cedar Bluff

6,510 assisted living community employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 14 employers in Cedar Bluff, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sterling Inn 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Victoria Landing, LLC 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookstone Estates of Effingham 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Naperville 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE DSTC CHESTER 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrisonburg Electric Commission 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS VA Culpeper 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avis Construction Company 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Food City Store #827 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Consolidated Steel, Inc. 97 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jennmar Corporation of Virginia, Inc. 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR VARIC - RICHLANDS 51 FTE
NAT-TCR Thomas Brown & Son Roofing 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1105 - NSM Seven Corners 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR COG003 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 10 14.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar San Antonio West 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kennedy Painting LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Commercial - 23 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sam S. Smucker & Sons, Inc. Lancaster 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.