Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Victoria Landing, LLC

Melbourne, FL · ~87 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Victoria Landing, LLC runs at 368% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Victoria Landing, LLC: 14.0 TCR = 368% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Victoria Landing, LLC safety composite

Victoria Landing, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Victoria Landing, LLC: 3.7 → 22.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 22.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.59× in 2021

Victoria Landing, LLC's TCR rose 18.5 from 3.7 in 2018 to 22.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 22.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Melbourne, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.0 · 368% of ind

  • DART 22.2 DART
  • RANK #348/396
  • PHOTO Commonwealth Senior …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Victoria Landing, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Victoria Landing, LLC averages 14.0 TCR (368% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Victoria Landing, LLC TCR series: 2018=3.7 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=22.2 · 2021=22.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Victoria Landing, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #348 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Victoria Landing, LLC (87 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Victoria Landing, LLC
Victoria Landing, LLC (87 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Victoria Landing, LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 22.2 22.2 3 12 0
2020 22.2 22.2 2 13 0
2019 7.8 7.8 5 0 0
2018 3.7 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Melbourne

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Cedar Bluff 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Inn 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookstone Estates of Effingham 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Naperville 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato PH 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Arcadia 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Lake City 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal River Nuclear Plant 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Morsco Supply Co. #2017 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Coast Shredding 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Farm Fresh To You Vernon Warehouse 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Medstar LLC 14.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dayton 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whitehall Specialties - Plant 3 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holland Walls Plant 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hantover Corporate Office 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.