assisted living community · Virginia

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield

Chesterfield, VA · ~60 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield runs at 306% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical assisted living community workplace, earning a grade F.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield: 11.6 TCR = 306% of assisted living community BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield safety composite

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield: 8.2 → 24.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 25.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.86× in 2024

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield's TCR rose 15.8 from 8.2 in 2016 to 24.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 25.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chesterfield, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 306% of ind

  • DART 21.6 DART
  • RANK #145/199
  • PHOTO Isle at Raider Ranch
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Isle at Raider Ranch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield averages 11.6 TCR (306% of the assisted living community BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=19.9 · 2022=25.6 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=24 · BLS 3.8

Where Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield falls in its industry

6,510 assisted living community establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 199 assisted living community employers in Virginia.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield (60 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield
Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield (60 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield has more employees than the assisted living community median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 24.0 21.6 7 3 0
2023 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2022 25.6 25.6 1 10 0
2021 19.9 19.9 1 8 0
2020 2.1 2.1 0 1 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 6.4 4.3 3 0 0
2016 8.2 5.5 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Chesterfield

6,510 assisted living community employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 59 employers in Chesterfield, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Isle at Raider Ranch 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The willows of Easley 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redstone Park Assisted Living 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Bay Memory Care 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 324-NiSource-Suffolk VA-Op Ctr 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coleman-Adams Construction, Inc 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Powell's Creek Solar Farm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fire & Life Safety America Tidewater 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesterfield County Schools 8,218 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Government 1,121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Richmond Plant 646 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schools Department of Student Transportation 635 FTE
NAT-TCR Casler Masonry, Inc. 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Isle at Raider Ranch 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #23 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pepe Ganga Caguas 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Huntsville - 03 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE VDF Agriculture Department 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plastipak- Medina R&D 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE DiFazio Power and Electric LLC 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.