assisted living community · Virginia

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor

Chesapeake, VA · ~52 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor runs at 293% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical assisted living community workplace, earning a grade F.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor: 11.1 TCR = 293% of assisted living community BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor safety composite

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor: 0.0 → 13.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 33.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2024

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor's TCR rose 13.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 13.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 33.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chesapeake, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 293% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #143/199
  • PHOTO Spring Creek Village
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spring Creek Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor averages 11.1 TCR (293% of the assisted living community BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=2 · 2020=19 · 2021=8.5 · 2022=33.6 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=13.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor falls in its industry

6,510 assisted living community establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 199 assisted living community employers in Virginia.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor (52 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor
Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor (52 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Commonwealth Senior Living at Georgian Manor has more employees than the assisted living community median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.5 11.2 5 1 0
2023 8.3 8.3 2 2 0
2022 33.6 33.6 1 14 0
2021 8.5 6.4 1 3 0
2020 19.0 14.8 2 7 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Chesapeake

6,510 assisted living community employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 434 employers in Chesapeake, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spring Creek Village 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Tarpon Springs 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chateau des Mons 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Creek Alzheimer's and Dementia Care Center 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Virginia Warehouse 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHARLOTTESVILLE-GAS 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Environmental Systems Service, Ltd. (Culpeper, VA) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 300-DREES-WASHINGTON DC 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ORF2 2,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesapeake Regional Medical Center 2,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR QVC Chesapeake, Inc. 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossways 931 FTE
NAT-TCR Birmingham South - 19 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR XPH 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hugo's #4 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital For Special Care 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hinesville 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ogden 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wiese Kansas City 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Energy Control & Design, Inc. 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.