Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Pennsylvania

Community Options Philadelphia PA

Philadelphia, PA · ~83 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Options Philadelphia PA runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Community Options Philadelphia PA: 3.9 TCR = 102% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Options Philadelphia PA safety composite

Community Options Philadelphia PA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Options Philadelphia PA: 1.0 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2024

Community Options Philadelphia PA's TCR rose 5.7 from 1.0 in 2023 to 6.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 102% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #50/145
  • PHOTO I&T - VA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: I&T - VA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Community Options Philadelphia PA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Options Philadelphia PA averages 3.9 TCR (102% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Options Philadelphia PA TCR series: 2023=1 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Options Philadelphia PA falls in its industry

1,320 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 145 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Pennsylvania.

Community Options Philadelphia PA (83 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Options Philadelphia PA
Community Options Philadelphia PA (83 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Community Options Philadelphia PA has more employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 1.1 6 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · PA · Philadelphia

1,320 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR I&T - VA 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arc of Crawford County Inc 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pittsfield 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poteau Plus 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE MD Basciani & Sons, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hillis Group, pLLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Ford City 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Hopewell Operator LLC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fload - Mco Gateway 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vabri - Bristol 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ncsyl - Sylva 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ivy Park at Burbank 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nynia - Niagara Falls Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mnbra - Brainerd 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omega Engineering 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.