Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed · New Jersey

Community Treatment Solutions

Moorestown, NJ · ~118 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Treatment Solutions runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed workplace, earning a grade C.

Community Treatment Solutions: 3.6 TCR = 95% of Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Treatment Solutions safety composite

Community Treatment Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Treatment Solutions: 3.3 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.71× in 2021

Community Treatment Solutions's TCR rose 2.8 from 3.3 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Moorestown, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 95% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #3/11
  • PHOTO 14-1 Pacella Park Dr…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 14-1 Pacella Park Dr. Randolph, MA 02368 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Community Treatment Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Treatment Solutions averages 3.6 TCR (95% of the Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Treatment Solutions TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=6.2 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Treatment Solutions falls in its industry

1,165 Residential group homes for th establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 11 Residential group homes for th employers in New Jersey.

Community Treatment Solutions (118 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Treatment Solutions
Community Treatment Solutions (118 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Community Treatment Solutions has more employees than the Residential group homes for the emotiona median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.1 6.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2017 6.2 6.2 9 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · NJ · Moorestown

1,165 Residential group homes for the emotionally disturbed employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 96 employers in Moorestown, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 14-1 Pacella Park Dr. Randolph, MA 02368 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crescent IRA - Coram 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deland Men's Residential Treatment 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grasshopper House LLC 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE EGM Builders 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJRHS - Wall 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4over International LLC - NJ State 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Moorestown Bortn Lndg Rd (1015) 3,322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Mount Laurel Tech Campus (1450) 1,731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Tech Campus (1450) 1,342 FTE
NAT-TCR 4769-367-Pottery Barn 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4818-ORWI 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4105 STOCKTON, CA 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Layer Site 4 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heritage Manor - Chillicothe #137 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0264 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cablo - Rialto 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utgeo - St. George Center 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.