Employer · New Jersey

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015)

Moorestown, NJ · ~2,237 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015): 0.6 TCR = 18% of industry BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) held a steady TCR band

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015)'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Moorestown, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #10/16
  • PHOTO L3 Cincinnati Electr…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~2,237 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L3 Cincinnati Electronics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) falls in its industry

388 industry establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 16 industry employers in New Jersey.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) (2,237 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) (2,237 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.5 0.2 10 1 0
2016 0.7 0.1 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · NJ · Moorestown

388 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 96 employers in Moorestown, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L3 Cincinnati Electronics 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linkabit Division-Florida 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR L-3 communications Cincinnati Electronics 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGMS-F104 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE main facility 2,237 FTE
STATE-SIZE HMH Hospitals Corporation 2,235 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanofi US Services Inc. 2,233 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAPITAL HEALTH CENTER HOPEWELL 2,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Moorestown Bortn Lndg Rd (1015) 3,322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Mount Laurel Tech Campus (1450) 1,731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Tech Campus (1450) 1,342 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 919 FTE
NAT-TCR Nelson Electric Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HUNTSVILLE_AL 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Signode Industrial Products LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR REN450 Brand Standards 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenheck Fan Corporation 2,237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iladd - Addison a Building 2,237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raytheon_Aurora_CO 2,237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.