Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing · Wisconsin

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001

Janesville, WI · ~20 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001: 10.7 TCR = 323% of Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 safety composite

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001: 0.0 → 21.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 21.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001's TCR rose 21.3 from 0.0 in 2023 to 21.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333241 · Janesville, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 323% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #25/25
  • PHOTO Cozzini LLC iowa
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cozzini LLC iowa (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 averages 10.7 TCR (323% of the Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=21.3 · BLS 3.3

Where COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 falls in its industry

215 Bakery machinery and equipment establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 25 Bakery machinery and equipment employers in Wisconsin.

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 (20 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001
COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 (20 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0

COMO Filtration Systems, Janesville - 001 has fewer employees than the Bakery machinery and equipment manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.3 7.1 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333241 · WI · Janesville

215 Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 178 employers in Janesville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cozzini LLC iowa 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern fabrication works LLC 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rowe's Services, Ltd. 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ole Hickory Pits - Nash Road 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alsum Farms Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FGI West Salem 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 760 Durand Agronomy 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE 764 Osseo Agronomy 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Service Center Operations : 0780 1,158 FTE
CITY-NEAR US - Supply Chain : 0780 1,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 780 - JANESVILLE, WI 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seneca Foods Corporation 650 FTE
NAT-TCR Allina Health Northfield Clinic 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohbgdc-B5510-Afh- Oh Bowling Green Dc 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR M & M Precision Machining Inc 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherryfield Plant 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lexington Clinic Richmond 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bushnell Feed Mill 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington Clinic Andover 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middle River WWTP 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.