Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) · California

Compass Foods, Inc.

Riverbank, CA · ~63 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compass Foods, Inc. runs at 414% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) workplace, earning a grade F.

Compass Foods, Inc.: 13.7 TCR = 414% of Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compass Foods, Inc. safety composite

Compass Foods, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2017→2023

Compass Foods, Inc. injury rate improved

Compass Foods, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.8 from 14.0 in 2017 to 10.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.0 · 2018=12.0 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=14.9 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=10.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Riverbank, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 414% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO Noel Plant
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Noel Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Compass Foods, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compass Foods, Inc. averages 13.7 TCR (414% of the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compass Foods, Inc. TCR series: 2017=14 · 2018=12 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=14.9 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=15.6 · 2023=10.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Compass Foods, Inc. falls in its industry

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, f establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Chickens, processing, fresh, f employers in California.

Compass Foods, Inc. (63 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Compass Foods, Inc.
Compass Foods, Inc. (63 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Compass Foods, Inc. has fewer employees than the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, can median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.2 5.8 7 0 0
2022 15.6 9.9 10 1 0
2021 16.3 16.3 7 3 0
2020 14.9 14.9 10 0 0
2019 12.6 7.9 8 0 0
2018 12.0 9.0 8 0 0
2017 14.0 11.7 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · CA · Riverbank

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 19 employers in Riverbank, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Noel Plant 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brakebush Wells 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smart Chicken - Tecumseh 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turkey Valley Farms 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE VF - Lodi 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Ventures, Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goossen Farms Inc 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGW, LLC 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monschein Industries, Inc. 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2096 - Riverbank 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2096 - Modesto Riverbank 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR O'Brien's Market 187 FTE
NAT-TCR Buffalo Welding, Inc. 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Noel Plant 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Olshan Foundation Repair Co. of Kansas City LLC 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Indian Oaks Living Center 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hyatt House Washington DC / The Wharf 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Generation 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE HealthWay Home Products Inc 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.