Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Alabama

Central Generation

Gantt, AL · ~63 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Generation runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Central Generation: 1.4 TCR = 113% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Generation safety composite

Central Generation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2023

Central Generation injury rate improved

Central Generation's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=4.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Gantt, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 113% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/28
  • PHOTO Tenaska Virginia Gen…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tenaska Virginia Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Central Generation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Generation averages 1.4 TCR (113% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Generation TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=0 · 2019=4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Central Generation falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 28 Electric power generation, fos employers in Alabama.

Central Generation (63 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Generation
Central Generation (63 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Central Generation has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 2.7 2 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AL · Gantt

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tenaska Virginia Generating Station 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amos 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Walton District Office 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panda Sherman Power, LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Directional 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE BESDB Fairhope 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABRAMSON LLC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE McShan Lumber Company 63 FTE
NAT-TCR Air Industries Company 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Comm Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sovereign Flavors Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaudin Ford 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compass Foods, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE KJ's Market #622 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt House Washington DC / The Wharf 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.