Hospice care services, in home · California

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles

Glendale, CA · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hospice care services, in home workplace, earning a grade D.

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles: 7.7 TCR = 149% of Hospice care services, in home BLS 5.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles safety composite

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2017→2018

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles injury rate improved

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles's TCR fell 4.8 from 10.2 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.2 · 2018=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · Glendale, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.7 · 149% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #145/188
  • PHOTO WES
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles averages 7.7 TCR (149% of the Hospice care services, in home BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles TCR series: 2017=10.2 · 2018=5.3 · BLS 5.2

Where Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles falls in its industry

3,635 Hospice care services, in home establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 188 Hospice care services, in home employers in California.

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles (25 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles
Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles (25 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Compassionate Care Hospice of Los Angeles has fewer employees than the Hospice care services, in home median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.3 5.3 0 1 0
2017 10.2 10.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · CA · Glendale

3,635 Hospice care services, in home employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 148 employers in Glendale, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WES 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BWV 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RCHC GA-COLUMBUS COMPANION 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augustana Chapel View 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 604 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 615 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHGL001 - HOSPITAL 2,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR VER Technologies, LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Lincoln City 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Garelick NY - Rensselaer 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Powder Coatings LLC 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-261-Williams Sonoma 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shopko Hometown #753 (Hot Springs, SD) 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Hometown #747 (Luverne, MN) 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Hometown #745 (Winner, SD) 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Pooler 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.