Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production · California

GM Ag Services, Inc.

Stockton, CA · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GM Ag Services, Inc. runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production workplace, earning a grade A.

GM Ag Services, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 14% of Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GM Ag Services, Inc. safety composite

GM Ag Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

GM Ag Services, Inc.: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 5× in 2024

GM Ag Services, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2020 to 3.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 14% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #1/175
  • PHOTO DiMare Homestead Inc…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DiMare Homestead Inc Tomato Shed (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

GM Ag Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GM Ag Services, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (14% of the Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GM Ag Services, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 4.5

Where GM Ag Services, Inc. falls in its industry

331 Vegetable and potato farming, establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 175 Vegetable and potato farming, employers in California.

GM Ag Services, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate GM Ag Services, Inc.
GM Ag Services, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

GM Ag Services, Inc. has fewer employees than the Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Stockton

331 Vegetable and potato farming, vegetable (except potato) dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DiMare Homestead Inc Tomato Shed 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rick Minkus Farms 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reeves Farms LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR T.C. Smith Produce Farm 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1601 Skyway Dr #300 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR EMD Millipore - 80 Ashby and 75 Wiggins 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR State steelworks 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Schrader Roofing Company of Lubbock 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Avena Contracting, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE AltaVita Independent Living LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana Department of Child Services - Montgomery County 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novel Builders, LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elkhart 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.