Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Jersey

Complete Care at Arbors Haven

Toms River, NJ · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Complete Care at Arbors Haven runs at 266% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Complete Care at Arbors Haven: 10.1 TCR = 266% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Complete Care at Arbors Haven safety composite

Complete Care at Arbors Haven scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Complete Care at Arbors Haven: 4.8 → 15.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 15.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.27× in 2021

Complete Care at Arbors Haven's TCR rose 10.5 from 4.8 in 2020 to 15.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Toms River, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 266% of ind

  • DART 12.8 DART
  • RANK #98/125
  • PHOTO Brookdale West Ashley
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale West Ashley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Complete Care at Arbors Haven in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Complete Care at Arbors Haven averages 10.1 TCR (266% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Complete Care at Arbors Haven TCR series: 2020=4.8 · 2021=15.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Complete Care at Arbors Haven falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 125 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Complete Care at Arbors Haven (50 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Complete Care at Arbors Haven
Complete Care at Arbors Haven (50 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Complete Care at Arbors Haven has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 15.3 12.8 6 0 0
2020 4.8 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NJ · Toms River

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 115 employers in Toms River, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale West Ashley 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Paddock Hills 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Winston-Salem 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Richland Hills 2 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kindle Energy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCKEE 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE KLINE BROTHERS LANDSCAPING EAST 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiely Civil Glassboro 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Medical Center 2,848 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shoprite of Fischer Bay 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Jersey Behavioral Health 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital Of Toms River 391 FTE
NAT-TCR Ready Mix Concrete- Havelock 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Boomers Modesto 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cattlemens Redding 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Indus Trade and Technology LLC 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guest Supply Carol Stream, Illinois 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guest Supply Grove City, Ohio 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arthur Funk & Sons, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Side Elementary 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.