Homes for the elderly with nursing care · New Jersey

Completecare at Laurelton

Brick, NJ · ~121 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Completecare at Laurelton runs at 414% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Completecare at Laurelton: 26.9 TCR = 414% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Completecare at Laurelton safety composite

Completecare at Laurelton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 40.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Completecare at Laurelton: 13.2 → 40.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 40.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.51× in 2020

Completecare at Laurelton's TCR rose 27.4 from 13.2 in 2019 to 40.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Brick, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 26.9 · 414% of ind

  • DART 40.7 DART
  • RANK #362/370
  • PHOTO EV Operations, LLC d…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EV Operations, LLC dba English Village Manor Rehab and Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Completecare at Laurelton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Completecare at Laurelton averages 26.9 TCR (414% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Completecare at Laurelton TCR series: 2019=13.2 · 2020=40.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Completecare at Laurelton falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #362 safest of 370 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in New Jersey.

Completecare at Laurelton (121 employees, TCR 26.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Completecare at Laurelton
Completecare at Laurelton (121 employees, TCR 26.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Completecare at Laurelton has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 40.7 40.7 9 28 0
2019 13.2 8.4 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NJ · Brick

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 58 employers in Brick, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EV Operations, LLC dba English Village Manor Rehab and Care Center 26.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpine Fireside Health Cetner 26.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylor Health Care Center 26.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-854 26.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lennar New Jersey 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delran 204-213 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Medal - South 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-North Jersey 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocean Medical Center 2,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1977 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1977 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR #641 Brick Shoprite 316 FTE
NAT-TCR Lakefield Veterinary Group - 158 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR EV Operations, LLC dba English Village Manor Rehab and Care Center 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Visiting Nurse Association 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Genoa - Public Works Department 26.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palms of Pasadena Hospital 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Motion Systems : Charlotte SSD 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest City Nc 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.