Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activ · Texas

Composite Lining Systems

Midland, TX · ~53 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Composite Lining Systems runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activ workplace, earning a grade A.

Composite Lining Systems: 0.8 TCR = 43% of Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activ BLS 1.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Composite Lining Systems safety composite

Composite Lining Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Composite Lining Systems held a steady TCR band

Composite Lining Systems's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 213112 · Midland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #97/196
  • PHOTO Truitt Oilfield Main…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Truitt Oilfield Maintenance Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Composite Lining Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Composite Lining Systems averages 0.8 TCR (43% of the Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activ BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Composite Lining Systems TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0 · BLS 1.9

Where Composite Lining Systems falls in its industry

467 Oil and gas field services (ex establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 196 Oil and gas field services (ex employers in Texas.

Composite Lining Systems (53 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Composite Lining Systems
Composite Lining Systems (53 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Composite Lining Systems has fewer employees than the Oil and gas field services (except contr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

213112 · TX · Midland

467 Oil and gas field services (except contract drilling, site preparation and related construction contractor activ employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 359 employers in Midland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Truitt Oilfield Maintenance Corp. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HES Odessa, TX 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moundsville Office 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raito Office 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE XIT Feeders 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolf Creek Feedyard 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Cattle Feeders, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glasscock County Coop 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Midland 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Memorial Hospital 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Jobsites 1,716 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProPetro Services, Inc. 1,666 FTE
NAT-TCR Home Construction Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Arnold MO Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR VWR, a Part of Avantor - Batavia 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Exactech Sarasota 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lithia Cdjrf of Eureka 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10134) 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fonua Construction LLC 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southerland, Arizona Plant 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.