Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing · Florida

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc.

St Petersburg, FL · ~368 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. safety composite

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 2.3 in 2022 to 2.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · St Petersburg, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Delta Manufacturing,…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~368 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Delta Manufacturing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. TCR series: 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. falls in its industry

334 Harness assemblies for electro establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Harness assemblies for electro employers in Florida.

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. (368 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc.
Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. (368 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Compulink Cable Assemblies of Florida, Inc. has more employees than the Harness assemblies for electronic use ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.6 9 0 0
2023 1.4 1.1 5 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · FL · St Petersburg

334 Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 113 employers in St Petersburg, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Delta Manufacturing, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pepperl + Fuchs Katy 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR i3 Assembly, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ohio Location 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Intrepid Powerboats, Inc 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mr Greens Produce LLC - Miami 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1996 368 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5671 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adult Day Center 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Pinellas Care Center 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR South County Service Center 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resale Shoppe St Petersburg 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Sister Schubert's Homemade Rolls 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR A.W. Oakes & Son, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 163006-Griswold | CT | CTG-100 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Super C Group LLC dba Alline Salon Group 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DRS Sustainment Systems Inc. 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beechwood Health Care Center 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crestron Electronics - Orangeburg, NY 368 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denso Products and Services Americas Inc 368 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.