Storage batteries manufacturing · North Carolina

Concentric Power

Name: Concentric Power Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Greensboro, NC · ~171 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concentric Power runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Storage batteries manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Concentric Power: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Storage batteries manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concentric Power safety composite

Concentric Power scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2020→2022

Concentric Power injury rate improved

Concentric Power's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.6 in 2020 to 0.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335911 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

DART 0.9 DART
RANK #3/4
PHOTO Solid Energy Systems…
BOOK 3y book
INJ 11 inj
SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Solid Energy Systems LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Exide Technolo

1.7
XALT Energy-Mi

1.7
This site

1.6
Solid Energy S

1.6
Burlingame Loc

1.6

What this shows Concentric Power averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Storage batteries manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Concentric Power TCR series: 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Concentric Power falls in its industry

161 Storage batteries manufacturin establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Storage batteries manufacturin employers in North Carolina.

Concentric Power (171 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Concentric Power has more employees than the Storage batteries manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	0.9	0.9	1
2021	1.3	0.0	1
2020	2.6	1.5	9

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335911 · NC · Greensboro

161 Storage batteries manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Solid Energy Systems LLC	WOBURN, MA	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Burlingame Location	BURLINGAME, CA	1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Exide Technologies-Fort Smith	FORT SMITH, AR	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	XALT Energy-Midland	MIDLAND, MI	1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Asphalt Paving	WILSON	171 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Corp et al	CHARLOTTE	171 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc.	STATESVILLE	171 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Kings Mountain	KINGS MOUNTAIN	171 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital	Greensboro	3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Guilford County Local Government - All Employees	Greensboro	3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Guilford County Local Government	Greensboro	3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB	Greensboro	2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR	JH Lynch & Sons Inc - Cumberland	Cumberland, RI	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	buybuy Baby Humble	Humble, TX	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Corrosion Monitoring Services	St Charles, IL	1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Water Group	Walnut, CA	1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Hydrologic Distribution Company	Pinellas Park, FL	171 FTE
NAT-SIZE	LHS Adult Crisis Stabilization Unit (ACSU)	Bowling Green, KY	171 FTE
NAT-SIZE	6458-ZNWL	North Wales, PA	171 FTE
NAT-SIZE	6458-ZCED	Cedar Rapids, IA	171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.